negation normal form造句

例句与造句

1. Another important normal form identified by Darwiche is Decomposable Negation Normal Form or DNNF.
2. Negation can be treated by initially making formulae in negation normal form, so that negation only occurs in front of literals.
3. This leads to an important property of logics based on classical logic, namely the existence of negation normal forms : any formula is equivalent to another formula where negations only occur applied to the non-logical atoms of the formula.
4. Such a formula is said to be in negation normal form and it is possible to prove formally that every formula " C " of classical logic has a logically equivalent formula " C "'in negation normal form.
5. Such a formula is said to be in negation normal form and it is possible to prove formally that every formula " C " of classical logic has a logically equivalent formula " C "'in negation normal form.
6. It's difficult to find negation normal form in a sentence. 用negation normal form造句挺难的
7. Boolean functions are often represented by sentences in propositional logic, and sometimes as multivariate polynomials over GF ( 2 ), but more efficient representations are binary decision diagrams ( BDD ), negation normal forms, and propositional directed acyclic graphs ( PDAG ).
8. Negation normal form is not a canonical form : for example, a \ land ( b \ lor \ lnot c ) and ( a \ land b ) \ lor ( a \ land \ lnot c ) are equivalent, and are both in negation normal form.
9. Negation normal form is not a canonical form : for example, a \ land ( b \ lor \ lnot c ) and ( a \ land b ) \ lor ( a \ land \ lnot c ) are equivalent, and are both in negation normal form.
10. The existence of negation normal forms drives many applications, for example in digital circuit design, where it is used to manipulate the types of logic gates, and in formal logic, where it is needed to find the conjunctive normal form and disjunctive normal form of a formula.
11. More generally, if \ varphi is not in negation normal form, we can state, as a rule for negation, that, when a game G ( \ lnot \ varphi, \ mathcal M, s ) is reached, the players begin playing a dual game G ^ * ( \ varphi, \ mathcal M, s ) in which the roles of Verifiers and Falsifier are switched.
12. The necessity of considering positive and negative satisfaction separately is a consequence of the fact that in dependence logic, as in the logic of branching quantifiers or in IF logic, the law of the excluded middle does not hold; alternatively, one may assume that all formulas are in negation normal form, using De Morgan's relations in order to define universal quantification and conjunction from existential quantification and disjunction respectively, and consider positive satisfaction alone.